The best way to win roulette is with a roulette computer, and you can achieve an edge of over 100%. In one of my last public demos, I achieved a 120% edge which is a win on almost every spin. Now if I bet on just one spin, it could have been in the 7% of losing spins. It’s unlikely but possible. But if I played on 10 spins, almost certainly I would have profited.
My point is if you have an edge, the more you play, the more likely you are to profit. So yes you can win roulette every time with the right technology, assuming it’s applied correctly. Predicting spin results is not really the difficult part – it’s getting away with winning without being detected.
Most professional players who play alone prefer rapid roulette betting terminals. These allow you to place bets on a touch bet screen, without needing to lean over tables. Professional players who play in a team can just as easily place bets on real tables. The best way to bet usually is by different players placing bets to represent specific sectors of the wheel.
It would be great if there was a single universal method to beat all roulette. But the truth is different methods are better suited to different wheels. For example, you may find a heavily biased roulette wheel where you simply need to bet on the same numbers. You could apply visual ballistics to win, but you would find simply betting on the same numbers to be easier. However, visual ballistics will likely produce a higher edge. But then again, visual ballistics requires the player to make late bets after the ball is released, and it may not even be possible to use.
The closest you can get to universally best ways to win roulette are the JAA system explained on this site, and the roulette computers. If you can only bet before the ball is released, then JAA is best. But if you can bet after ball release, then roulette computers are almost always best – they are quicker to use and more profitable.
Start with the basics rules and learn how to play roulette. The following advice is intended for casual players who are more about having fun than being a serious player. Tips for professional players are quite different.
Set your loss limit and goals: Set your bankroll and stick to it.
Know the payouts and odds of each bet: If you know the chance of winning, you can calculate the bankroll you’ll need so you have at least some good wins. Generally outside bets like dozens, odds, evens 1-18 and so on are bets where statistically you can expect to win at least once every few spins. This way you don’t blow your bankroll too soon.
Be careful of progression betting like the Martingale: This is where you increase bet size after losses, in attempt to win back losses. Unless your roulette strategy first increases the accuracy of predictions, no progression betting is going to help you.
Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land. The betting table has nothing to do with the winning number. This is not as difficult as you may first think. Roulette is not a random game, and it has many predictable aspects.
For a lifetime of professional roulette tips that really work, take the time to fully browse this website.
How Much Time Do Professional Methods Take To Use?
Roulette computers are by far the quickest, but you still may need to dedicate 4hrs or more just getting enough data for one wheel. Some players may consider this far too time consuming and absurd. A roulette computer user would consider the notion of 8 hours work from 9am-5pm for day after day for around $150/day, then paying 35% tax, to be closer to insanity.
But excluding roulette computers, a good professional method to win roulette consistently (that can earn a living) may take around 20 hrs per week. This again may seem absurd to some people, but consider this is around half the time as a normal job, but it can pay much better if done right.
If you are considering becoming a professional roulette player, understand that while it is not uncommon for players to win hundreds of thousands or even millions, this level of income (with modest bet size) requires time and dedication, just like any other job. But the average player doesn’t play full-time. The average player keeps their normal job, and plays roulette part-time or whenever the need arises for an income boost. In any event, if you expect to consistently win money from roulette, you will need to use an approach much more sophisticated than “doubling bets” after losses.
Roulette is not much different from how it was 6-8 years ago. Some changes have made winning easier, such as rapid roulette. But it’s quite different to how it was 50+ years ago. Naturally, as casinos learn about how roulette is beaten, they will do what is reasonable to limit losses from professional players. Again they presently can’t do this fully without losing revenue. For example, to prevent roulette computer users from measuring the ball speed and betting late, the dealer can call no more bets earlier. This will stop a roulette computer player from winning. But it will also stop the average losing player from placing late bets that lose. For every 1 roulette computer player, there may be 50,000 normal players. So it is not viable for casinos to fully forbid late bets.
To limit losses to professional roulette players (advantage players), casinos rely on:
Detecting consistent winners, then applying countermeasures (like forbidding late bets) until the consistent winner either loses or leaves. Then the casino can resume normal procedures.
Using roulette wheels and technology that makes roulette spins less predictable.
There are far more undetected professional players than those who are detected. So for professional players, avoiding detection is mostly a matter of not being greedy and winning more modest amounts.
As for modern roulette wheel technology: there’s no doubt that wheels are getting harder to beat. But it is actually much harder to design a wheel with completely unpredictable spins than it is to develop a method which at least slightly increases the accuracy of the player’s winning number predictions. And to overcome the casino’s typical small edge of -2.7% is not at all difficult – it only requires the roulette player to only have slightly better than random accuracy when predicting the winning number. In suitable conditions, this is not at all difficult to achieve. This is the key to winning at roulette.
Videos Showing Roulette Being Beaten
Free roulette physics course: See the free course for winning at roulette by visiting www.roulettephysics.com – a sample of what you receive for free is below:
Roulette computers: Visit www.roulette-computers.com for more information. Also see the following video demonstrations:
Advice on Having Realistic Expectations
If you do proper research, you’ll understand that it is not only possible to win at roulette, it is being done every day. But keep in mind for every consistent winner, there are likely tens of thousands of players who lose with a system that has no chance of winning in the long term. It makes sense that if you are trying to beat roulette, you should start with what has historically already shown to work. This doesn’t mean your current approach, whatever it may be, will not also be successful if developed further. Also keep in mind many people have even committed suicide because they couldn’t beat this game. But you can be sure such people were looking at the wrong approaches. Blindly trying to do the impossible will drive anyone insane. Trying to do the possible, with proper and logical approaches, makes more sense.
If you spend years using the same approaches used by millions of players, you are going to lose. But if you don’t want to look at the physics of the roulette wheel, then at least try something that nobody has tried before. If you are not trying to be a pioneer and just want a roulette strategy that works, then the application of physics-based roulette systems (advantage play) may be what you’re looking for.
But a word of warning: don’t expect to beat all wheels in all conditions. None of the methods that have worked previous or today have ever been effective on every wheel. In all known cases, the players had to search for suitable wheels and conditions. The prevalence of suitable wheels mostly depends on the method you use – you will find that specific approaches may work on perhaps only 5% of wheels. Whereas other approaches may be successful on far more wheels (30-50%).
Other than using roulette computers, the overall best methods I have developed to beat roulette will beat approximately 35% of modern wheels in real casino conditions. But this doesn’t mean you will obliterate the casino with 35% of their wheels. It means of the 35% of wheels, you will overcome the normal edge against you which is -2.7%. In typical conditions, the edge you will achieve is between +5 to +15%. So on average, around a +10% edge. This may not seem like much, but consider a -2.7% edge is all a casino needs to often make hundreds of thousands from a single wheel in one night. An edge of over 50% is not uncommon with roulette computers. But despite their larger edge, professional players have serious disadvantages such as the casino being able to simply ban players for any reason. So you can’t just win millions overnight. Well you can, but expect to be noticed. If you have a more modest bankroll, you need to win much more discrete amounts. How much is ok to win? It depends on the table. But say if the minimum inside bet is just $5, then the most you should take from the table is $500 or so. Or if the minimum is $50, then generally winning $5,000 in one session is ok (provided you don’t repeat it too often and in the presence of the same casino staff). This is just a rough guide though, and there are many variables that determine what is “covert” to win.
Winning and avoiding detection is one thing. But the biggest roadblock for professional players is time. More specifically, most people don’t have the will or patience to spend in casinos for many hours. It can quickly become very boring and tiring. The boredom can lead to costly mistakes.
I once spoke to the director of one of the largest and best-known roulette wheel manufacturers. He and his colleague spoke candidly about the viability of beating their wheels. They stated something to the effect that “Yes we know wheels can be “clocked” (their word for ‘beaten”). We know all about it”. They spoke rather defensively as if I was attempting to somehow expose them. I was actually just looking to purchase a new roulette wheel, which they refused because they were aware of who I was, and my intentions to study it. On another occasion I spoke to their chief wheel designer, who is also well aware just about any wheel can be beaten in the right conditions. The manufacturer websites neglect to explain to their clients (casinos) how easily beaten many modern roulette wheels are, but the wheel manufacturers at least do have knowledge. Again although wheels are getting more difficult to beat, to create a wheel that produces truly random and unpredictable spins would be extremely difficult and costly, and perhaps not viable considering it is not difficult for casinos to identify a player who is consistently winning hundreds of thousands, which is what it would take to significantly impact the income of most casinos.
It’s important to note that with all the known methods that have worked and even made headlines, the physics of the roulette wheel was involved. As far as I’m aware, there has never been a case where a player has won millions over sustained and long-term periods of play without using physics. Certainly players have won millions with sheer luck. But I’m referring to methods that have repeatable success.
The common factors of the effective methods:
Real roulette wheels only
Roulette wheel physics
Inside bets based on sectors of the wheel
I’m not aware of any legitimately effective method that beats roulette, without all of the above factors. So the most important roulette tip I can give is focus on real wheel physics.
Strategies That DON’T work:
Save yourself some time and understand why most systems lose:
Betting progression: most gamblers believe that if you bet higher to cover losses, that you’ll eventually win and your bankroll will increase. But roulette doesn’t work this way. When you increase bet size, all you do is increase the amount you risk on that individual spin. Remember that the wheel has no memory. It doesn’t know or care if there were 10 reds in a row. And even after 10 reds, the odds or red or black spinning next haven’t changed. So changing bet size wont help at all (unless you actually have a method to increase the accuracy of predictions).
Thinking something is “due”: as explained above, even after 10 or so reds, the odds of red or black spinning next do not change at all. Nothing is ever “due” to happen. The ball lands where it does only from cause and effect. That’s real physical variables only.
Systems that work well on a set sample of spins, but not new spins: Every set of previous spins will appear to have mysterious coincidences and patterns that aren’t really patterns at all. In fact you can put them down to simple statistics in the sense that certain sequences of spins will inevitably occur over time. It doesn’t mean they will occur over new spins in the near future.
Another important consideration is the house edge. For the European wheel, it is -2.7%. A simple explanation is if you bet on one number, you can expect to win 1 in 37 spins. When you win, you are paid 35 chips plus your original bet. So after 37 spins, on average you’ll be left with 36 chips. If everything was fair and the house edge didn’t exist, you should have 37 chips after the 37 spins. To make this even simpler to understand, even when you win, you still actually lose because you are paid an UNFAIR amount. The effect of this is you slowly drain your bankroll. The only way to overcome this is by winning more times than statistically expected. In this case, winning more than 1 in 37 times.
Players that have no understanding of these concepts will forever create the same systems again and again, but just repackaged a different way. And many players waste years of their life before they understand why they’ve been losing. Almost every professional gambler was once at this stage – even myself. And now we ask ourselves how we couldn’t see plain logic before.
